Johnson's closing argument is about the relationship with failure. She observes that the people who navigate continuous S-curve growth most successfully are not better at avoiding failure. They are better at processing it. Failure at the bottom of a new curve is inevitable: it is how the curve works. The learning requires mistakes. The mistakes generate information. The information, if extracted and applied, accelerates the learning. The failure is not the problem; the failure is the mechanism. What separates the people who grow continuously from those who stagnate at the top of an old curve is what they do with failure. The growth-oriented person treats it as a data point: what specifically happened, what was the cause, what does that teach me about the next attempt? The plateau-oriented person treats it as a verdict: this is too hard, this is not for me, this is a sign I was wrong to try. Johnson argues that developing a genuine data orientation toward failure is a trainable disposition. It requires practice, particularly in low-stakes situations, but it builds over time into the kind of resilience that makes continuous S-curve jumping sustainable. Her final recommendation is simple: jump. Start the new curve before you feel ready. The discomfort at the bottom is the evidence that the learning is happening. The willingness to be uncomfortable is the only thing standing between you and the next level of growth.